Ron Rice Forensic Handwriting Examination & Identification*

MA Alleged and Pseudo-Document Examiners
Home | Florida Office | Ron Rice | Ron Rice (continued) | Ron Rice Federal & State Voir Dire | Musculoskeletal Anatomy | MA Alleged and Pseudo-Document Examiners | MA Alleged and Pseudo-Document Examiners (continued) | Attorney Letter | Alleged and Pseudo-Document Examiners (continued) | - | FYI | About Checkmate Forensic Services | Services | Testimonials | Testimonials (continued)... | Testimonials (continued) | Testimonials (continued) | Testimonials (continued) | Actual Cases - Terrorism | Actual Cases - JonBenet Consultation | Actual Cases - School Terrorism | Actual Cases - School Terrorism (continued) | Actual Cases - Sexual Harassment | Actual Cases (continued) | Actual Cases - Stalking/Death Terrorism | Service Fees | Contact Us | Publications | Publications (continued)

THE FOLLOWING IS PROVIDED AS A PUBLIC SERVICE  
~
U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger once remarked, "70-90% of attorneys are incompetent, unethical, or both".
~ 
Certain of the following identified alleged/pseudo-document examiners,
unless proved otherwise, are a sampling of the 99% of frauds and perjurers polluting the profession of Forensic Handwriting Examination and Identification.
~
 Should your attorney be one of the "70-90%", s/he will allow [one of] the following alleged/pseudo-document examiners to continue to damage you and others by not challenging their alleged/false credentials and, you will probably lose your civil/criminal action before the court.  Do not allow this to happen!
~  
It is important to understand that Expert Document Examination or Handwriting Examination services may involve as a minimum, the health, welfare, reputation, personal and/or business survival, complex financial issues, charges of a criminal nature [which may result in prison sentences] as well as other vital legal matters.  For a person to wrongly allege s/he is a properly educated and trained functioning document examiner is a serious violation of trust to a client, their attorneys and, most importantly, the courts.
~
 A person who alleges s/he is an authentic DE must be more than willing to present documented and verifiable proof as requested for the safety and welfare of the general public. There is a major difference between a Document Examiner and a Handwriting Examiner.  The differences are extensive and easily verified by authentic published documents.
~
THE FOLLOWING are CERTAIN of the USUAL SUSPECTS/PERJURERS in the MA ROUGES GALLERY WHO CANNOT PROVIDE DOCUMENTED PROOF OF THEIR TRUE  FDE CREDENTIALS.
~ 
 OTHERS will SOON be IDENTIFIED!  

Alleged Document Examiner
 
It is the personal opinion of Ron Rice that the term "alleged", "fraud", "pseudo", and "fraudulent" have the same meaning unless proven other wise.
~
Looking for a professional liar for hire, who is ethically repulsive and, a fraudulent story teller?  I suggest:
~
Alan T. Robillard
~
a.k.a. The Great Pretender
&
**.."on the way back, five large coffee's, black, and hold the sugar."

 "Prosecutors wanted to confront Robillard with allegations of impropriety at the FBI including charges he withheld exculpatory evidence in the trial of a man accused of murdering a 5 year old girl in the 1980's..."

(Robillard stated publicly on Court Television that his career with the FBI was as a Hair and Fiber expert - NOT a document examiner.) 

1.  A retired FBI hair and fiber expert who claims to have been a former (alleged) FBI educated and trained Forensic Document Examiner.  This alleged FBI educated and trained document examiner testified in Probate Courts: [what he did when he had questions about handwriting],

"I walked across the street** and asked the CIA." [ I did not know the FBI and CIA were across the street from one another.] 

"The FBI does not have a training course."    If this guy 'is telling the truth' where did he get his training?  The U.S. Secret Service has a Training Manual for their Document Examiners.  Why not the FBI?  Should document examiners from whom and/or laboratory where he is alleged to have received his training, be in question?

   2.   Robillard states on his CV he was in charge of the FBI Questioned Document Unit from:  "December, 1993 - September, 1994"  [9/10 months].
  
               3.  Robillard testified in court, under oath, he was in charge of this same Unit for:"approximately, yes." - a year and one half [18  months].       
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
This intentional lie, as well as his other queastionable statements - coming from the testimony, under oath, of a retired federal [FBI] law enforcement officer is disturbing and must be investigated by the courts! Is it possible additional 'questionable statements' have been made in other court testimonies?   Or does he "just wing it" to suit his need at the moment? 
How will you and your attorney feel once you learn an alleged or pseudo-Document Examiner is opposing YOU or YOUR FAMILY in either a civil or criminal matter before the courts?
There  are certain others who will accuse Rice of 'unfair business practice' by posting these true facts.  These same people must, therefore, believe that the intentional lying, misrepresentation and/or exaggeration of his/her credentials - to the courts -  businesses, attorneys,  etc. -  is good business practice.


Remember, FBI Document Examiners authenticated the "forged" Salamander Letter created by Mark Hoffman in early 1980. Robillard alleges he was undergoing education and training with the same FBI Document Examination laboratory during the early 1980's.


  His allegations as a functioning DE (when in reality he stated his career was as a hair & fiber expert) is most difficult to overcome in court.  Unfortunately, the welfare and interests of opposing clients are at risk due to the inability of their attorneys to provide proper representation, as required by law, due to the impossibility of having his alleged years as a functioning DE verified/documented.    


The following articles published by the New York Daily News can only leave a reasonable person wondering about certain ethical and integrity challenged behavior of certain FBI agents.

"UNSEEN OF THE CRIME  FBI SPLICING DNA DATA"  by Juan Gonzales

"Earlier this year, the FBI's world famous crime laboratory came under fire after a Justice Department investigation exposed slipshod practices by lab agents in several major cases, among them the World Trade Center and Oklahoma City bombing..." 

"...Documents of the Justice Department probe obtained by Lefcourt group[National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers] under the Freedom of Information Act, some of which have been made available to the Daily News, contain shocking allegations by some FBI agents.  Among those allegations:

1.     One lab technician who has since been fired 'would determine if suspects were Afro-Americans,' then "manipulate tests to prove them guilty."

2.     "In 1989, all the DNA/serology examiners except one in the DNA unit failed a proficiency test, but the supervisor threw away the results because, according to one agent, "he feared they would be discoverable" by defense lawyers.

3.     "The bureau often sends "one person, who's not even a scientist, to a scene, and then [lets] him shoot from the hip to the public [and] the press."

4.     "...Special Agent Greg Parsons said he tried to transfer out of the DNA unit because he was so dissatisfied about the slipshod practices that some agents used to arrive at DNA matches."

5.     "Parsons is the agent who claimed that a technician in the unit was fired after supervisors discovered he had manipulated tests to convict African-Americans."

6.     "ALAN ROBILLARD, a supervisor at the lab, confirmed in a 1996 interview that he destroyed the proficiency test that all but one of his agents in the DNA unit had failed   (My emphasis)

7.     According to the summary of Robillard's interview:                                                                                                                                     

"It was discovered that the test was procedurally flawed and results in 'nonsensical' results across the board.  He [Robillard] does not recall exactly what the problem was."
          
8.     DAILY NEWS by Melissa Grace, Staff Writer:                                                                                                                                                
                                                                        
Defense begins:  Brooke Astor signature real on Will update, says handwriting expert.  
                                                                                
  "Prosecutors wanted to confront Robillard with allegations of impropriety at the FBI including charges he withheld exculpatory evidence in the trial of a man accused of murdering a 5 year old girl in the 1980's... "Robillard stated publicly on Court Television that his career with the FBI was as a Hair and Fiber expert - NOT a document examiner                                                      
                                                                                  
                                              ...continued on following page...